I'm a Mac user so these are Mac specific Answers, I will see if there is a Windows version and update my answer when I can test it to make sure (see below, there is a way). I was surprised when I found that out and didn't want to go back to using a program like MAMP.Īnyway here are two ways to achieve this goal (neither are very hard). With Wordpress MS you can't have port numbers in the URL b/c some of the URL mapping will not work correctly. I had this issue when a client of mine asked me to do a Wordpress Multisite setup. You can continue to use a port number or if you want or need to use port 80 there is a way. You can run Vagrant as root i believe but VirtualBox won't agree with that. What you are trying to do here isn't possible just using vagrant without running vagrant as root. * About to connect() to localhost port 8080 (#0)ĭo I need guest additions installed? I looked around on how to install this but I'm not sure if it has to be installed on the host or the guest. When I curl the guest machine curl -v 'localhost:8080' I also cleared the iptable config in the guest machine with iptables -F. I ran sudo lsof -i :8080 on my local machine and gave me no results. # For masterless, mount your salt file rootĬonfig.vm.synced_folder "salt/roots/", "/srv/"Ĭonfig.vm.share_folder "mypath", "/var/www/leo", "." I added an index.html file in /var/www and I get the contents back when I curl localhost:80 nfigure("2") do |config| When i ssh into the box apache is running fine. I'm using salt as a provisioning agent and I have installed apache,php,mysql packages successfully. And there's a setting for "Cascaded Router Enable" that is greyed-out on the Subnets and DHCP page: what's up with that being inaccessible.I've been struggling trying to connect to a centos 6.4 vm using Vagrant. Exchange server emails working fine again (as expected).ĭoes anyone have any insight into what's going on with the BGW320-505 port forwarding and/or passthrough issue? Maybe a link to a tech-level manual? (The only manuals I found online were pretty obviously meant for consumer level home users.) Work around: Changed back to Comcast broadband this morning. Or quite possibly I didn't know which incantation to use with BGW320-505? - Could be. it became obvious that ports were not being forwarded. and allowing more than sufficient time for nameservers passthrough. Problem: After configuring the BGW320-505 for port forwarding (25, 443 and the usual ports for an in-house Exchange server) to our in-house Mikrotik biz-class router. New ATT connection: ATT tech installed new Nokia BGW320-505 gateway router with ATT fiber connection online to a client office yesterday afternoon (replacing a Comcast business class connection). Experience level: sys admin with 40 years
0 kommentar(er)
